| Human and machine vision
Neural mechanisms in vision
Image processing, imaging systems, and scientific visualization
techniques.
Mechanisms that underlie the perception of visual motion, stereopsis,
texture, and the deployment of attention in vision
|
|
- Psychophysical experiments in vision and audition
- fMRI
- Computational neural models
- Image processing and visualization techniques
|
| Feature-based attention affects the processing
of the selected feature throughout the visual field. We showed that
such global attentional modulation is not restricted to the attended
feature but spreads to task-irrelevant features that are bound to
the attended one. This cross-feature global attentional selection
increased the strength of fMRI responses in the motion-sensitive
area MT+. These findings imply that features belonging to the same
object are bound and selected jointly even outside the focus of
attention (published in Neuroreport, 2005). In addition, we showed
that directing attention to a specific color of an object results
in attentional modulation of the processing of task-irrelevant and
not consciously perceived motion signals that are spatiotemporally
associated with this color throughout the visual field. Such implicit
cross-feature spreading of attention takes place according to the
veridical physical associations between the color and motion signals,
even under special circumstances when they are perceptually misbound.
These results imply that the units of implicit attentional selection
are spatiotemporally co-localized feature clusters that are automatically
bound throughout the visual field. This article was placed on the
cover page, Neuron, 2005, and featured on NPR (National Public Radio).
We obtained similar evidence in experiments that demonstrated the
binding of color and motion in early stages of brain processing
(published in the European Journal of Neuroscience, 2005).
We used realistic three-dimensional (3-D) stimuli of a hollow mask
and a scene that produce an illusory volumetric percept. We observed
that the illusion is weakened when the stimuli are inverted, suggesting
the involvement of top down processes. This inversion effect is
stronger for the facial than the scene stimulus. These results support
the hypothesis that configural processing is stronger for the 3-D
perception of faces than it is for scenes, and extend the conclusions
of earlier studies on 2-D stimuli (published in Perception, 2004)
|
|
For complete list: PubMed
Sohn, W., Chong, .S.C, Papathomas, T.V.,
Vidnyanszky, Z. (2005) Cross-feature spread of global attentional
modulation in human area MT+. Neuroreport.
Melcher, D., Papathomas, T.V., Vidnyanszky, Z.
(2005) Implicit attentional selection of bound visual features.
Neuron 46: 723-729.
Blaser, E., Papathomas, T.V.,
Vidnyanszky, Z. (2005) Binding of visual motion and color is local
and automatic. European Journal of Neuroscience 21: 2140-2144.
Papathomas, T.V., Bono, L. (2004)
Experiments with a hollow mask and a reverspective: Top-down influences
in the inversion effect for 3-D stimuli. Perception 33: 1129-1138.
Sohn, W., Papathomas, T.V., Blase,
E., Vidnyanszky, Z. (2004) Object-based cross-attribute attentional
modulation from color to motion. Vision Research, 44: 1437-1443.
Morikawa, C. and Papathomas, T.V.
(2002) Influences of motion and depth on lightness induction: An
illusory transparency effect. Perception 31: 1449-1458 .
Papathomas, T.V. (2002) Experiments
on the role of pictorial cues in Hughes’ reverspectives. Perception
31: 521-530.
Vidnyanszky, Z.., Blaser, E. and Papathomas,
T.V. (2002) Motion integration during motion aftereffects.
Trends in Cognitive Science 6: 157-161.
|